Dynamic lightpath restoration based on bidirectional initiation for wavelength-routed WDM networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dynamic restoration is one of the basic survivability paradigms for surviving single-link failures in wavelength-routed wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) networks. In dynamic restoration, no spare network resources are reserved before a network failure occurs. The network must dynamically discover spare network resources to recover the disrupted network services after a network failure occurs. Accordingly, dynamic restoration is efficient in resource utilisation but slow in service recovery. Fast provisioning of service recovery is a great concern with dynamic restoration. A bidirectional initiation restoration mechanism (BIRM) is proposed for dynamic path restoration in wavelength-routed WDM networks. BIRM differs from existing path restoration mechanisms in that it allows both the source node and the destination node of a broken lightpath to respectively initiate a path restoration process in the event of a link failure. The purpose is to reduce the path restoration time so that a backup path can be established quickly for each broken lightpath that traverses a failed link. Based on BIRM, a dynamic path restoration protocol is also presented. Moreover, the performance of BIRM is evaluated through simulation experiments in terms of the path restoration time and request blocking probability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it