MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542782822 · doi:10.1109/epc.2007.4520326

Optimal Fault Predictors for Arc-Type Faults in Radial and Meshed Alternating Current Distribution Systems

2007· article· en· W2542782822 on OpenAlexaff
G. B. Weyrich Morris, Eduardo Castillo-Guerra, Adel M. Sharaf, M. Stevenson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFault (geology)Fault indicatorStuck-at faultReliability engineeringNonlinear systemFault coverageEngineeringFault modelFault detection and isolationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient and reliable linear and nonlinear fault diagnostic systems are of vital importance in modern utility power grids as quick, accurate detection of faults can assist in preventing system failures that cause economic loss and endanger human or animal life. The foundation of any fault diagnostic system is its set of predictors; robust predictors naturally lead to a reliable system. This work fills the need for a deep investigation into reliable fault detection predictors. Novel harmonic-based fault predictors are developed for diagnosis of fault condition in both radial and meshed type AC distribution systems, with four fault classification groups (bolted fault, high impedance nonlinear fault, linear fault, and a no-fault classification). These new fault predictors are optimized and rigourously tested against earlier fault predictors using existing fault models and known statistical methods in both noiseless and noisy conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.652

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207