MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542959421 · doi:10.1109/nusod.2013.6633100

Complete optoelectronic simulation of patterned silicon solar cells

2013· article· en· W2542959421 on OpenAlexaff
Arghavan Arjmand, Dylan McGuire

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsLumerical Solutions (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSiliconAbsorption (acoustics)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsSolar cellOpticsGratingPhotonPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patterned silicon solar cells are fully modeled optically and electrically using Lumerical Solutions' optical simulation software, FDTD Solutions and electrical simulation solver, DEVICE. The optical simulation calculates the spatial distribution of photon absorption in the silicon when the cell is illuminated by unpolarized sunlight with the AM1.5 solar spectral intensity. The photon absorption data is converted into a spatial generation rate of electron-hole pairs. The electrical simulation uses this generation rate to calculate the collection efficiency of electron and hole carriers, accurately accounting for surface and bulk recombination in silicon. Two main designs are simulated, each with periodic structures: a grating structure and a square pyramid structure. The short-circuit current as well as the overall conversion efficiency for the two devices are calculated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207