MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2542996374 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.075336

Excitonic luminescence of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Br</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>-intercalated layered semiconductors<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>−</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi>WS</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2005· article· lv· W2542996374 on OpenAlexaff
L. Kulyuk, D. Dumcehnko, E. Bücher, K. Friemelt, O. Schenker, Luc Charron, E. Fortin, Tyler Dumouchel

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuminescencePhysicsPhotoluminescencevan der Waals forceExcitonSpectral lineAtomic physicsCondensed matter physicsMoleculeOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiative recombination processes in the transition metal dichalcogenide compound $2H\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{WS}}_{2}$ are investigated. The strong sharp line photoluminescence in the spectral range 1.32--1.34 eV is attributed to the recombination of excitons bound on electron-attractive neutral centers, formed by ${\mathrm{Br}}_{2}$ molecules intercalated in the van der Waals gap of the $2H\text{\ensuremath{-}}{\mathrm{WS}}_{2}$ layered crystals. These centers, located at energy ${E}_{T}=0.1\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{eV}$ below the conduction band, display properties similar to the acceptorlike isoelectronic traps in GaP or Si, providing efficient radiative recombination. The temperature dependence of the zero-phonon spectral line intensities and of the luminescence decay time is described in the framework of a kinetic model in thermal equilibrium conditions. The atypical temperature increase of the luminescence decay time in the temperature range $T=2\text{--}7\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K}$ is related to the presence of a long lifetime sublevel, situated at 0.3 meV above the lowest excitonic state. The observed broadband emission centered at 0.97 eV is ascribed to recombination via a deep center due to an instrinsic defect of the layered crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0080.007
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3230.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207