Vers une reconstitution de la vie culturelle des femmes à Montréal dans les années 19401
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la perspective de ce dossier, qui vise à saisir les contours de la rupture littéraire de la décennie 1940 et qui réinterroge les « classiques », mais aussi et peut-être surtout les manifestations trop souvent considérées comme illégitimes par la critique, cet article s’intéresse à la culture féminine qui se déploie alors dans l’espace urbain. Se basant sur des dépouillements de la grande presse de l’époque et sur l’interprétation de nouvelles données statistiques et géolocalisées, l’analyse cherche à cartographier les trajectoires, les réseaux et la production des femmes de cette génération, hors des institutions et en marge du champ restreint. Elle permet ainsi de jeter un regard neuf sur la constitution de l’offre et des publics populaires dans la première moitié du xxe siècle, et pose les bases d’une réflexion sur l’émergence d’une culture moyenne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".