Résurrection : un espace littéraire pour l’imaginaire en temps de guerre
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En tant que revue belge d’avant-garde publiée pendant la Première Guerre mondiale, Résurrection (1917-1918) rend compte des doutes mais aussi de l’espoir qui dominent cette période complexe. Animé par Clément Pansaers, le périodique rassemble des contributions d’auteurs belges, français et allemands, dans une volonté manifeste de sublimer le réel par l’imaginaire et de puiser dans la littérature les ferments d’un monde nouveau, dont les auteurs pressentent l’avènement. Une analyse du contenu des 6 numéros dévoile son caractère hétéroclite, avec une dominante de textes expressionnistes mais aussi (pré)dadaïstes et unanimistes. L’article se penche aussi sur la ligne politique de la revue, que marque son directeur. Y dominent par-dessus tout la recherche du maintien de l’humanisme malgré la barbarie de la guerre et un appel fervent à la concorde des peuples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".