MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2543499840 · doi:10.1109/iecon.1991.239342

On the controllability and observability of flexible beams under rigid-body motion

2002· article· en· W2543499840 on OpenAlexaff
K. Cho, N. Hori, Jorge Angeles

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservabilityCurvatureControl theory (sociology)ControllabilityDiscretizationRigid bodyKalman filterMathematical analysisBeam (structure)Displacement (psychology)MathematicsPhysicsComputer scienceClassical mechanicsGeometryApplied mathematicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors consider the transverse vibrational control of a single flexible beam undergoing large planar rotational motion. The beam is modeled using a cubic spline technique, which approximates the linearly elastic, continuous beam with a finite number of nodal points. This spatial discretization method provides a useful linear relationship between displacement and curvature, which allows the use of strain gages to measure curvature along the beam. It is shown that kinetic boundary conditions such as those associated with tip loads can be included in the cubic spline model. An optimal control strategy is used to suppress the transverse vibrations while forcing the end tip to follow a prescribed trajectory, and a Kalman filter is used to optimally estimate state variables which are not obtained through direct measurement. Using the optimal controller with the Kalman filter, extensive simulations have been carried out to assess the feasibility of real-time control using the proposed modeling approach. The possibility of using a reduced number of curvature measurements is investigated.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207