MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2543515305 · doi:10.1109/epecs.2013.6713050

Fuzzy-based control of on-load tap changers under high penetration of distributed generators

2013· article· en· W2543515305 on OpenAlexaff
Maher A. Azzouz, Hany E. Z. Farag, Ehab F. El‐Saadany

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Fuzzy logicDistributed generationComputer scienceVoltageNonlinear systemMATLABAC powerProbabilistic logicVoltage regulationControl engineeringEngineeringRenewable energyControl (management)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage regulation in the distribution networks becomes more challenging when the distribution generation (DG) units are introduced. The reasons behind that are: the reverse power flow which is introduced by the DG units, in addition to the probabilistic nature of the generated power due to renewable-based DG units. In this paper, a fuzzy algorithm is proposed to provide an adaptive reference of the OLTC controller, such that the OLTC, which feeds a multiple feeders, can mitigate the effect of the high penetration of the DG units. The motivations behind using the fuzzy logic are: 1) it can map nonlinear relations behind its inputs and output; and 2) it can provide a smooth transition, which lead to a more relaxed tap operation compared to the conventional logic control. The proposed fuzzy algorithm is tested using a radial structure distribution network which is modeled using SIMULINK/MATLAB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207