MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2543705200 · doi:10.1109/vnis.1995.518839

Estimation of expected minimum paths in dynamic and stochastic traffic networks

2002· article· en· W2543705200 on OpenAlexaffabout
Liping Fu, Laurence R. Rilett

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShortest path problemComputer scienceMathematical optimizationHeuristicPath (computing)K shortest path routingComputationConstrained Shortest Path FirstYen's algorithmShortest Path Faster AlgorithmFloyd–Warshall algorithmLongest path problemDijkstra's algorithmAlgorithmMathematicsGraphTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For most in-vehicle route guidance systems (RGS) currently under development, the optimal route between an origin and destination is defined as the one with the minimum expected travel time. This optimal route is calculated by applying standard shortest path algorithms to the network where the link travel times are modeled as deterministic rather than as stochastic. The drawback to this method is that while it is computationally tractable, it may, in fact, generate a sub-optimal solution. Conversely, when the stochastic nature of link travel times are explicitly modeled, an optimal algorithm can become computationally inefficient for use within an actual application. The objective of this paper is to develop a new shortest path algorithm which takes into account the stochastic nature of link travel times without significantly increasing the overall computation time. The dynamic and stochastic shortest path problem (DSSPP) is first defined and the properties associated with this problem are discussed. A heuristic algorithm based on the k-shortest path algorithm is subsequently proposed. The trade-off between solution quality and computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm will be demonstrated on a network from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207