MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2543751951 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0152

Genome-wide association study of dynamic developmental plant height in soybean

2016· article· en· W2543751951 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hai Yan Lü, Hai Wang Li, Rui Fan, Hongyan Li, Junyi Yin, Jianjun Zhang, Dan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismTraitBiologySNPGenome-wide association studyPrincipal component analysisGenetic associationGeneticsMathematicsGenotypeStatisticsGeneComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant height (PH) is an important agronomic trait affecting crop yield and quality. In this study, a soybean collection of 192 natural accessions and 1536 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) makers were used to identify genomic regions associated with PH. There is a large genetic variation in PH with a diverse panel. Three phenotypic indexes (PH measured at six stages, the conditional PH, and the relative growth rates of PH) were used to identify developmental behavior for PH in soybean. Six methods were used to minimize false-positive associations in association mapping, and finally the generalized linear model for principal component analysis had been used in this study. Three SNPs, BARC-040651-07807, BARC-030433-06867, and BARC-042475-08274, were highly significantly associated with PH in the final growing period, and two SNPs, BARC-038795-07333 and BARC-013749-01246, were connected with PH in the early growing period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant Science→Same topicSoybean genetics and cultivation→French-language works237,207→