MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2543768027 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444472

Contour-based 3D point cloud simplification for modeling freeform surfaces

2009· article· en· W2543768027 on OpenAlexafffund
Kuldeep K. Sareen, George K. Knopf, Robert Canas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceSurface reconstructionComputer visionArtificial intelligenceSpline (mechanical)Surface (topology)Computer graphics (images)Solid modelingThin plate splineVisualizationMathematicsGeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reconstruction of accurate freeform surface models of 3D scanned objects is a common task encountered in creating virtual reality environments for anatomical reconstruction, cartography, cultural artifact modeling, digital archaeology, infrastructure renewal, and computer-aided design. Difficulties occur in reconstructing smooth surfaces from these scanned data sets because the acquired data is very large and is often infiltrated with scanning errors. For surface reconstruction, visualization, and interactive virtual modeling, it is necessary to reduce the amount of raw scanned data. Many existing data simplification techniques are complex and not directly applicable to spline-based surface models. A novel two stage contour-based data simplification algorithm is introduced in this paper and applied to facial surface reconstruction, which may be used for human modeling for computer games or model creation for virtual museums. The first stage extracts a series of equally spaced sectioned contours directly from a dense 3D data points. In the second stage, each extracted contour is redefined as a cubic B-spline curve by reduced number of control points defined by a user defined reduction ratio. A lofted surface is finally created from these reconstructed contours. The effectiveness of the synthetic surface reconstruction algorithm is demonstrated using its deviation values from its original point cloud data set. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm generates a fairly accurate spline based facial model with only 5-20% of the actual scanned data, based upon the surface complexity. Performance can be improved by increasing the number of extracted contours, followed by a greater reduction ratio in the second data simplification stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207