MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2543845204 · doi:10.7202/1036669ar

Appréhender l’invisible : réflexions sur un dispositif méthodologique élaboré pour l’analyse du travail domestique

2016· article· fr· W2543845204 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Isabelle Courcy, Catherine des Rivières‐Pigeon, Marianne Modak

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le travail domestique et la théorisation de son exploitation constituent des enjeux fondamentaux de la critique féministe. Par ailleurs, les efforts pour appréhender de façon empirique le travail domestique se butent à plusieurs obstacles politiques, théoriques et méthodologiques. Cet article présente un dispositif méthodologique original qui a été élaboré pour analyser le travail domestique effectué par des mères et des pères auprès de leur enfant présentant un trouble dans le spectre de l’autisme. L’analyse d’une première application de ce dispositif méthodologique montre comment, en comparaison des outils généralement utilisés, il permet une meilleure documentation de certains aspects de ce travail et une mise en évidence stratégique de l’inégalité vécue à cet égard par les participantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.191
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesFrench-language works237,207