Representations sociales et Implication des étudiants de L’UFR SHS (Sciences de l’Homme et de la Societe) de L’Universite Felix Houphouët Boigny Face au systeme LMD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les representations sociales sont devenues incontournables quand on cherche a comprendre l’environnement social. Plusieurs travaux ont revele la relation entre les representations sociales, le comportement et les attitudes d’un individu. Le contexte academique actuel amene a poser la question de l’incidence des representations sociales du systeme LMD sur l’implication personnelle des etudiants. Cette etude a ete realisee sur un echantillon de quatre-vingt-dix (90) etudiants. Les resultats de l’etude indiquent que le systeme LMD est un objet de representations sociales qui mobilise de part et d’autre, differentes attitudes qui influencent le niveau d’implication des etudiants. Les relations entre cognitions mises au jour ont permis de mieux saisir la logique interne de cette representation. On peut en conclure que la representation sociale influence le niveau d’implication des etudiants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".