MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544024350 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1996.647608

Estimation of continuous-time models from sampled data via the bilinear transform

2002· article· en· W2544024350 on OpenAlexafffund
Sunil L. Kukreja, Robert E. Kearney, Henrietta L. Galiana

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMedical Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBilinear transformNyquist rateQuantization (signal processing)LTI system theoryBilinear interpolationDiscrete time and continuous timeMathematicsNyquist frequencyApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmDiscrete-time signalNoise (video)Nyquist–Shannon sampling theoremComputer scienceLinear systemStatisticsMathematical analysisSampling (signal processing)Analog signalSignal transfer functionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new technique for estimating Continuous-Time (CT) Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) models from discrete data. The method uses MOESP to estimate the order and parameters of a Discrete-Time (DT) system. The bilinear transform is then used to calculate an equivalent CT model. This gives rise to process zeros. Extensive simulation studies have demonstrated that there are few process zeros when no noise and quantization are present. However, when quantization and noise are present process zeros always lie above 0.5 times the Nyquist rate. Hence, in converting from DT to CT it is necessary to discard zeros above 0.5 times the Nyquist frequency, to yield an accurate CT model. With two experimental examples the authors demonstrate that method does indeed work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl Systems and IdentificationFrench-language works237,207