MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544169117 · doi:10.4000/terminal.1447

La déconnexion temporaire à Facebook : entre le FOMO et l’intériorisation douce du contrôle social

2016· article· fr· W2544169117 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTerminal · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche explore les logiques d’action liées aux usages de Facebook par les jeunes adultes et à la déconnexion temporaire au site. Facebook est utilisé pour pratiquer de la surveillance sociale, mettre à jour son statut et contribuer aux discussions en lien avec les travaux universitaires. Les formes de déconnexion privées sont des conduites de préservation. La reconnexion au site s’effectue car ces usagers succombent aux pressions sociales, par peur de manquer quelque chose (FOMO) et d’être exclus des activités sociales. Les bénéfices liés aux pratiques de socialisation jouent également un rôle en la matière et priment sur le besoin de se protéger de la surveillance. Ces usagers intériorisent doucement le contrôle social. Force est de constater qu’ils ont une connaissance limitée des modes opératoires du site. Il est important de se demander dans quelle mesure la faible visibilité des pratiques de surveillance institutionnelle et les changements constants introduits aux architectures des médias sociaux façonnent les inégalités d’usage. Ce qui contribuerait à la déconnexion, même temporaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.144
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTerminalSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207