MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544179568 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2006.312093

Model for comprehensive simulation of overhead high voltage power transmission line galloping and protection

2006· article· en· W2544179568 on OpenAlexaff
Jicai Hu, Zeqing Song, Jianguo Ma, Shijing Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric power transmissionTransmission lineInertiaCoupling (piping)Overhead (engineering)AerodynamicsOverhead linePower flowVibrationPantographPower transmissionEngineeringStructural engineeringPower (physics)MechanicsAcousticsElectric power systemElectrical engineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mechanical galloping of overhead power transmission lines may cause flashover between lines and damage of insulator and tower. Existing models of galloping are not complete to simulate the galloping of three dimensional vibration coupling. In this paper, a three-degree of freedom model is suggested to account for the influences of environmental conditions, geometrical configurations and movement coupling properties. It can be deduced from the model that the power line galloping, with change of environmental conditions, may transit between activities of inertia coupling, vertical exciting and twisting inspiring, and the galloping amplitude is governed by the aerodynamic factors and coupling properties. The simulation results indicate that the galloping of transmission line can be limited by using air-flow-spoilers. The proposed model, simulation results and anti-galloping measures may be helpful for utilities to assess transmission line galloping performance and design of mitigating strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207