MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANALISIS FINANSIAL USAHA SOMA PAJEKO (SMALL PURSE SEINE) KELURAHAN MANADO TUA I KOTA MANADO

2013· article· id· W2544216756 on OpenAlexaff
Olive Monique Palit, Grace O. Tambani, Vonne Lumente

Bibliographic record

VenueAKULTURASI (Jurnal Ilmiah Agrobisnis Perikanan) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessBusiness administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study examines the financial analysis soma pajeko in Manado Tua 1 Village Manado city. This study aims to determine the feasibility of soma pajeko and learn financial analysis of businessabout soma pajeko in Manado Tua I village Manado City . capital investment required to start a business with Small Purse Seine or Soma Pajeko Rp. 544 million, while the return on investment for a period of 1 year 6 months. Sharing system 50% for owners and 50% for fishermen workers. required 15-20 workers Keyword : Analysis Financial, small Purse Seine, Manado Tua I Abstrak Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang analisis finansial usaha soma pajeko di Kelurahan Manado Tua 1 Kota Manado. penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kelayakan usaha soma pajeko dan mempelajari analisis finansial usaha soma pajeko di Kelurahan Manado Tua I Kota Manado. modal investasi yang diperlukan untuk memulai usaha dengan Small Purse Seine atau soma pajeko yaitu Rp. 544.000.000, sedangkan jangka waktu pengembalian Investasi selama 1 tahun 6 bulan. System bagi hasil 50% untuk nelayan pemilik dan 50% untuk nelayan pekerja. Tenaga kerja dibutuhkan 15 – 20 orang pekerja. Kata Kunci : Analisis Finansial, soma Pajeko, Manado Tua I

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAKULTURASI (Jurnal Ilmiah Agrobisnis Perikanan)Same topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207