Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) is a very popular trend in the corporate world despite some paradoxical characteristics and scarce research on this topic. Drawing on the theoretical lens of workarounds, this paper proposes a dynamic explanation of BYOD-enabled workarounds. Specifically, we develop a conceptual model representing the multi-level process model that occurs when an IS-enabled practice enacted with an organizational device is replaced by a BYOD-enabled workaround. We claim that three outcomes are then possible: status quo, reverting to the organizational practice, or legitimizing the BYOD-enabled workaround as the new organizational practice. Moreover, we explain the conditions that regulate the proposed model. \n \nIn addition to addressing an important research gap, this study clarifies how and why several employers feel that they cannot prevent employees from using a BYOD approach. If a mix of conditions is already in place, there isn’t indeed much to do, but to embrace the reality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it