MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544319392 · doi:10.1109/icm.2009.5418662

Hardware efficient design of speed optimized power stringent Application Specific Processor

2009· article· en· W2544319392 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEmbedded systemPower consumptionPower (physics)SpeedupDesign methodsComputer hardwareComputer architectureParallel computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New standards in communication, multimedia and signal processing have challenged the researchers to formalize the design methodology of an optimized application specific processor (ASP) where the performance requirement should meet operational constraints like speed, chip area and power consumption. In this paper we describe a novel design approach to design a hardware efficient speed optimized power stringent application specific processor customized for a desired high performance. We initiate the design approach with the mathematical model of the application with strict operating constraints as specifications and finally describe our design at register transfer level. The proposed approach is capable for designing an ASP which is efficient not only in terms of hardware area but also contradictory parameters like speed and power consumption. To demonstrate our design approach for this power limited speed optimized ASP we selected a sample function as our application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207