MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Fetal Vs. Adult Hematopoietic Progenitors Respond Differently to NOTCH1: Implications for Pediatric Vs. Adult T-ALL.

2012· article· en· W2544442903 on OpenAlexaff
Vincenzo Giambra, Sonya H.L. Lam, Amy M.L. Ng, Claudia Benz, Olena O Shevchuk, Connie J. Eaves, Andrew P. Weng

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowProgenitor cellHaematopoiesisImmunologyImmunophenotypingLeukemiaFetusCancer researchMedicineBiologyStem cellAntigenGeneticsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2381 T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive malignancy of T-cell progenitors which affects both children and adults. Whereas pediatric T-ALL is curable in 80–90% of cases, only 40% of adults with T-ALL survive beyond 5 years. Fetal liver and adult bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) are known to differ in terms of their gene expression programs and functional properties. Despite this work, the extent to which differential programming of fetal and adult HSPCs may impact the biology of their respective leukemias in children and adults remains unexplored. NOTCH1 is a prominent oncogene in T-ALL and activated by mutation in over 50% of cases. The retroviral NOTCH1 mouse bone marrow transplant model of T-ALL is well established; however, most investigators use 8–12 week-old adult mice as bone marrow donors for these experiments and thus these studies could be interpreted as having modeled adult disease. In order to explore the possibility that fetal program HSPCs would more accurately model pediatric disease, we transduced lineage-negative fetal liver HSPCs with activated NOTCH1 (ΔE) retrovirus, transplanted them into syngeneic (C57BL/6) recipients, and compared the behavior of the resulting leukemias to those generated from lineage-negative 8-week-old adult bone marrow HSPCs. Primary transplant recipient mice developed nearly identical T-ALL disease in terms of penetrance, latency, disease distribution/burden, and immunophenotype. Serial transplantation of these leukemias into secondary recipients, however, revealed stark differences in that whereas “adult” leukemias were readily transplantable, “fetal” leukemias were largely non-transplantable. In order to quantitate leukemia-initiating cell (LIC) frequencies in these two situations, we performed secondary transplants into highly permissive, immunodeficient (NOD/Scid/Il2rg−/−) recipients at limiting dilution and observed fetal leukemias to exhibit 500-fold lower LIC activity than adult leukemias (1 in ∼4500 cells vs. 1 in ∼9 cells, respectively). To identify potential mechanisms that might underlie this difference in LIC activity, we compared the behaviors of fetal liver vs. adult bone marrow-derived HSPCs shortly after transduction with NOTCH1(ΔE) virus. Interestingly, NOTCH1 induced fetal HSPCs to cycle rapidly whereas adult HSPCs were largely quiescent. We also noted that non-transduced cells in fetal HSPC cultures were also cycling rapidly, and through a series of fetal/adult mixing and conditioned media experiments, we determined that NOTCH1 induces an autocrine IGF1 signaling circuit in fetal, but not adult HSPCs. This observation was also confirmed to hold true for CD34+ human cord blood vs. adult bone marrow HSPCs. Expression profiling/qRT-PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies further revealed NOTCH1 to induce IGF1 transcription and altered chromatin structure (increased H3K4me3 and decreased H3K27me3 marks) specifically in fetal, but not adult HSPCs. These findings suggest that developmental stage-specific programming in fetal vs. adult progenitors underlies their differential responses to oncogenic NOTCH1 signaling, and also the biological aggressiveness of resulting leukemias. Therapeutic targeting of adult-specific pathways may thus achieve improved clinical responses in adults with T-ALL and perhaps also the minority of pediatric patients with more aggressive, possibly “adult-like” disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207