MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2544784719 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2007.4487284

Moment-Based SNR Estimation for SIMO Wireless Communication Systems Using Arbitrary QAM

2007· article· en· W2544784719 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Stéphenne, Faouzi Bellili, Sofiène Affes

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record/Conference record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, & Computers · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdditive white Gaussian noiseQuadrature amplitude modulationAlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer scienceQAMMoment (physics)A priori and a posterioriWirelessEstimation theoryOrthogonalityMathematicsBit error rateWhite noiseTelecommunicationsPhysicsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new method for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation is considered when multiple receiving antenna elements receive quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) signals in complex additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) spatially and temporally white (uncorrelated between antenna elements). In this paper, we also present the extension of other existing methods to the single input multiple output (SIMO) configuration. The procedure is non-data-aided (NDA) since it is a moment- based method and does not require, therefore, the a priori knowledge or the detection of the transmitted symbols. Monte Carlo simulations are used to estimate the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) as a measure of performance. The new method is shown to outperform the best NDA moment-based SNR estimation methods, namely the M2M4and Gao's methods even when they are extended to the SIMO configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference record/Conference record - Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, & ComputersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207