MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545047448 · doi:10.1109/icece.2006.355669

Discrete Wavelet Transform Based Detection of Disturbances in Induction Motors

2006· article· en· W2545047448 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. S. K. Khan, Mohammad Azizur Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformFault detection and isolationInduction motorWaveletWavelet transformComputer scienceFault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStationary wavelet transformControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, two discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based algorithms, which have both a detection and classification phase, are developed for diagnosing and detecting various disturbances occurring in three-phase induction motors. In the first approach, the criterion for the detection phase is the comparison of the DWT coefficients of fault currents using the selected mother wavelet `db3' at the sixth level of resolution with a threshold determined experimentally during healthy condition of the motor. A feature vector representing the second norm of details of fault currents of six levels of resolution is used to discriminate between different faults. The second approach is based on the comparison of modulus maxima of the DWT coefficients for fault detection. The classification of faults is based on localized parameters estimation. The protection phase of both the algorithms is implemented in real-time using the ds1102 digital signal processor board. It gives a trip signal almost at the instant or within one cycle of the fault occurrence in all cases of faults

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.001

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207