MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545047448 · doi:10.1109/icece.2006.355669

Discrete Wavelet Transform Based Detection of Disturbances in Induction Motors

2006· article· en· W2545047448 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. S. K. Khan, Mohammad Azizur Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscrete wavelet transformFault detection and isolationInduction motorWaveletWavelet transformComputer scienceFault (geology)Pattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceStationary wavelet transformControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, two discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based algorithms, which have both a detection and classification phase, are developed for diagnosing and detecting various disturbances occurring in three-phase induction motors. In the first approach, the criterion for the detection phase is the comparison of the DWT coefficients of fault currents using the selected mother wavelet `db3' at the sixth level of resolution with a threshold determined experimentally during healthy condition of the motor. A feature vector representing the second norm of details of fault currents of six levels of resolution is used to discriminate between different faults. The second approach is based on the comparison of modulus maxima of the DWT coefficients for fault detection. The classification of faults is based on localized parameters estimation. The protection phase of both the algorithms is implemented in real-time using the ds1102 digital signal processor board. It gives a trip signal almost at the instant or within one cycle of the fault occurrence in all cases of faults

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207