MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545486281 · doi:10.11159/nddte16.112

Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering

2016· article· en· W2545486281 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jae‐Won Lee, Hyo-Seok An, Kuen Yong Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in Nanotechnology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsTissue engineeringPolysaccharideMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringChemical engineeringChemistryPolymer chemistryEngineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polysaccharide is one of widely utilized materials in biomedical areas due to its excellent biocompatibility. However, most polysaccharide-based hydrogels are typically prepared in the presence of excipient chemical reagents that may cause toxicity. In this presentation, we report how hyaluronate hydrogels can be prepared without toxic chemical cross-linking agents. Hyaluronate is composed of -1,4-D-glucuronic acid--1,3-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine residues, and is abundant in synovial fluid and extracellular matrix. We introduced alginate to the hyaluronate backbone, allowing gel formation in the presence of calcium ions The mechanical properties of hydrogels were varied depending on type and concentration of polysaccharide. Tissue regeneration using these hydrogels were carried out by subcutaneous injection of primary chondrocyte/hydrogel constructs into a mouse model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Recent Advances in NanotechnologySame topicHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsFrench-language works237,207