Brush DC motors with concentrated windings and soft magnetic composites armatures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The armatures of conventional brush DC motors are using windings with interlocked coils elements. With this kind of distributed winding, the axial length of the end-windings is usually very important and their copper volume is large. In this paper, the authors present new structures of brush DC motor armature using a concentrated winding with a plurality of simple coils wound around the same tooth. The copper volume is about 60% lower than in the classical winding armature and the current commutation remains efficient. This kind of structure is well adapted to the use of soft magnetic composite materials for the realization of the magnetic circuit and can be used over a wide power range. The design method and a synthesis of these machines with concentrated winding armatures are presented. A prototype of concentrated winding brush DC motor is compared to a conventional motor used in a typical automotive application. The performance of the new structure in terms of torque to copper volume ratio is much higher than in the case of the classical structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it