MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545537603 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2006.355161

Efficient Minimum Variance Receivers for MC-CDMA Systems Using Transmit Diversity

2006· article· en· W2545537603 on OpenAlexaff
Shahrokh Nayeb Nazar, Ioannis Psaromiligkos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCovariance matrixComputer scienceCode division multiple accessAlgorithmTelecommunications linkChannel (broadcasting)Transmit diversityCovarianceSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsFading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The issues of blind channel estimation and information symbol detection for the downlink of Space-Frequency Block Coded Multi-Carrier Code Division Multiple Access (SFBC MC-CDMA) schemes are revisited. Specifically, we first formulate blind channel estimation and detection algorithms based on the Second-Order Statistics (SOS) of the frequency-domain received signal using a Minimum Variance (MV) criterion. Then, we identify the unique structure of the input covariance matrix based on which we propose modifications of the presented algorithms that are computationally efficient and offer enhanced performance in practical cases where only an estimate of the received signal covariance matrix is available. The effectiveness of the new algorithms utilizing the special structure of the received signal covariance matrix is demonstrated through the comparison with the corresponding conventional approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207