MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545570492 · doi:10.1109/iceas.2011.6147110

A hybrid approach for short term electricity price and load forecasting

2011· article· en· W2545570492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ankita Mohapatra, Manas Kumar Mallick, Bijaya Ketan Panigrahi, Zhihua Cui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiddingElectricity marketComputer scienceElectricity price forecastingElectricityElectric power systemElectric power industryTerm (time)Artificial neural networkElectricity generationElectrical loadElectric powerEconometricsOperations researchPower (physics)EconomicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMicroeconomicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a deregulated power industry, accurate short term load forecasting (STLF) and price forecasting (STPF) is a key issue in daily power market. The load forecasting helps in unit commitment as well as in economic scheduling of the generators. The price forecasting helps an electric utility to make important decisions like generation of electric power, bidding for generation, price switching and infrastructure development. Price forecasting is very much useful for energy suppliers, ISOs and other participants in electric generation, transmission and distribution. This paper presents a hybrid approach for the STLF and STPF. The time series data pertaining to load / price is decomposed into various decomposition levels by the use of Wavelet Transform (WT) and each level obtained by this process is predicted using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). The performance of the proposed hybrid model is validated using New Delhi load data and Ontario electricity price data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207