MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2545672696 · doi:10.1002/chem.201604340

The First Lanthanide Complexes with a Redox‐Active Sulfur Diimide Ligand: Synthesis and Characterization of [LnCp*<sub>2</sub>(RN=)<sub>2</sub>S], Ln=Sm, Eu, Yb; R=SiMe<sub>3</sub>

2016· article· en· W2545672696 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry - A European Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetism in coordination complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanthanideChemistryElectron paramagnetic resonanceDiimideLigand (biochemistry)CrystallographyAdductRedoxSpectroscopyInorganic chemistryMoleculeNuclear magnetic resonanceIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The first lanthanide complexes with a redox‐active sulfur diimide ligand, [LnCp* 2 (Me 3 SiN=) 2 S] (Ln=Sm, Eu, Yb; Cp*=η 5 ‐C 5 Me 5 ), are reported. The complexes were synthesized by using [LnCp* 2 (THF) 2 ] and (Me 3 SiN=) 2 S and have been thoroughly characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, EPR spectroscopy, UV/Vis/NIR electronic absorption spectroscopy and SQUID magnetometry. The results, as interpreted by CASSCF/SOC‐RASSI calculations providing a non‐perturbative treatment of spin‐orbit coupling, indicate that these paramagnetic complexes are best described as Ln 3+ and [(Me 3 SiN=) 2 S] − . adducts. As such, these complexes contain the first isolated and structurally characterized acyclic [(RN=) 2 S] − . radical anions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it