MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546100487 · doi:10.1109/cjmw.2008.4772509

Time-Domain Analog Front-End for UWB WLAN Transform-Domain Receiver

2008· article· en· W2546100487 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Zebdi, Daniel Massicotte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise figureBasebandLow-noise amplifierElectronic engineeringWidebandElectrical engineeringPower gainAmplifierUltra-widebandComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)PhysicsEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of the time-domain direct-sequence front-end for transform-domain ultra-wideband (UWB) wireless local area network (WLAN) receiver. The proposed architecture comprises a single-ended voltage-voltage dynamic feedback low-noise amplifier (LNA), quadrature mixer, and baseband filter. The dynamic feedback with inductive output load reduces the LNA to a simple second-order filter, with zero at the origin, while improving the conversion gain (CG), noise figure (NF). Thus, the CG is further maximized when limiting the two poles within the 5-6 GHz frequency band. The mixer, based on a merged quadrature topology, employs single-peak notch network, with benefits to the CG, NF, and IIP3. The front-end, drawing 10, 9 mA form 1.8 v, achieves at 5.6 GHz 34.8 dB conversion gain, 12.1 dB noise figure, and 1-dB gain desensitization with -8 dBm interferer power at 7 GHz. Other simulation results are -2.35 dBm minimum IIIP3, and -35 dBc rejection at the UWB groups #1 and #3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207