MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546170546 · doi:10.1109/gem.2015.7377204

Applications of the Illimitable Space System in the context of media technology and on-stage performance: A collaborative interdisciplinary experience

2015· article· en· W2546170546 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Song, Serguei A. Mokhov, Jilson Thomas, Sudhir P. Mudur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsComputer scienceToolboxOpenGLShaderMultimediaHuman–computer interactionGraphicsContext (archaeology)GestureComputer graphics (images)SoftwareVisualizationOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time video production technology has to do with adding visual effects at the time of a performance production itself. This work describes research-creation, development and use of a software system, Illimitable Space System (ISS), in interactive artistic performance productions. ISS is a real-time interactive configurable toolbox used to create visual effects and musical visualizations based on input such as voice or gestures with the corresponding image mapping and also with multiple input devices. The production team created and used a subset of the features of the ISSv2 toolbox for an interactive artistic performance. ISS makes it easy to explore rapid prototyping of interactive graphical applications using Jitter/Max and Processing with OpenGL, shaders, and featuring connectivity with various devices. Such a rapid prototyping environment is ideal for entertainment computing, as well as for artists using interactive graphics for real-time performances. We share the expertise we developed in connecting real-time graphics with on-stage performance using the Illimitable Space System (ISS) v2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207