Fault-tolerant scheduling of multicore mixed-criticality systems under permanent failures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mixed-criticality systems are real-time systems that combine both safety-critical and non-critical applications. These systems have been gaining interest due to their practical applications and their adoption in standards in several domains. On the other hand, it is often overlooked in the research on mixed-criticality systems that these systems are still safety critical and must be able to operate even when the system's processors fail. In this paper, we present an approach to design multicore mixed-criticality systems that can survive permanent processor failures. Under the proposed work, critical tasks executing on the failing cores are migrated to other cores to allow them to continue execution. Space is made on the new cores by dropping non-critical tasks. Schedulability analysis is developed by extending the AMC-rtb analysis to support processor failures. The problem of finding a mixed-criticality system configuration on a multicore architecture is formulated as a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem. The MILP produces a system design that is schedulable on the underlying platform and tolerant to processor failures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it