MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546566026 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsw014

Detecting the Cognitive Prodrome of Dementia with Lewy Bodies: A Prospective Study of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

2016· article· en· W2546566026 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionOtsuka PharmaceuticalW. Garfield Weston FoundationValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsDementia with Lewy bodiesDementiaParkinsonismREM sleep behavior disorderPsychologyCognitionPsychiatryMedicinePolysomnographyAudiologyDiseaseInternal medicineElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Objectives: Long-term studies in REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) have shown a high rate of conversion into synucleinopathies. We aimed to prospectively follow-up a large cohort of RBD patients to identify cognitive markers for early detection of prodromal dementia. Methods: Seventy-six idiopathic RBD patients underwent polysomnography and a complete neuropsychological and neurological assessment and were then followed for a mean of 3.6 years. Cognitive characteristics at baseline were compared between patients who remained disease-free and those who developed a synucleinopathy, and between those who developed dementia first and those who developed parkinsonism first. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of cognitive tests for detecting prodromal dementia. Results: At follow-up, 34 patients developed a neurodegenerative disease: 19 parkinsonism-first and 15 dementia-first. RBD patients who first developed dementia were impaired at baseline in all cognitive domains (attention/executive functions, learning/memory, and visuospatial) compared to patients who developed parkinsonism. Moreover, 93% of patients who first developed dementia had mild cognitive impairment at baseline compared to 42% of patients who developed parkinsonism. RBD patients who developed parkinsonism first were similar at baseline to disease-free RBD patients on cognition. In dementia-first patients, two cognitive tests assessing attention and executive functions (Stroop Color Word Test and Trail Making Test) reliably predicted dementia (area under the curve ≥0.85) compared to parkinsonism-first patients or controls. Conclusions: This study shows that cognitive tests assessing attention and executive functions strongly predict conversion to dementia in RBD patients, and may be useful endpoints to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent cognitive deterioration in RBD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it