MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546566026 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsw014

Detecting the Cognitive Prodrome of Dementia with Lewy Bodies: A Prospective Study of REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

2016· article· en· W2546566026 on OpenAlexafffund
Daphné Génier Marchand, Jacques Montplaisir, Ronald B. Postuma, Shady Rahayel, Jean‐François Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionOtsuka PharmaceuticalW. Garfield Weston FoundationValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchTeva Pharmaceutical Industries
KeywordsDementia with Lewy bodiesDementiaParkinsonismREM sleep behavior disorderPsychologyCognitionPsychiatryMedicinePolysomnographyAudiologyDiseaseInternal medicineElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study Objectives: Long-term studies in REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) have shown a high rate of conversion into synucleinopathies. We aimed to prospectively follow-up a large cohort of RBD patients to identify cognitive markers for early detection of prodromal dementia. Methods: Seventy-six idiopathic RBD patients underwent polysomnography and a complete neuropsychological and neurological assessment and were then followed for a mean of 3.6 years. Cognitive characteristics at baseline were compared between patients who remained disease-free and those who developed a synucleinopathy, and between those who developed dementia first and those who developed parkinsonism first. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the diagnostic value of cognitive tests for detecting prodromal dementia. Results: At follow-up, 34 patients developed a neurodegenerative disease: 19 parkinsonism-first and 15 dementia-first. RBD patients who first developed dementia were impaired at baseline in all cognitive domains (attention/executive functions, learning/memory, and visuospatial) compared to patients who developed parkinsonism. Moreover, 93% of patients who first developed dementia had mild cognitive impairment at baseline compared to 42% of patients who developed parkinsonism. RBD patients who developed parkinsonism first were similar at baseline to disease-free RBD patients on cognition. In dementia-first patients, two cognitive tests assessing attention and executive functions (Stroop Color Word Test and Trail Making Test) reliably predicted dementia (area under the curve ≥0.85) compared to parkinsonism-first patients or controls. Conclusions: This study shows that cognitive tests assessing attention and executive functions strongly predict conversion to dementia in RBD patients, and may be useful endpoints to determine the effectiveness of interventions to prevent cognitive deterioration in RBD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207