MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W254658573

Development and test programme of the wheel mechanisms for the Mid Infra-Red Instrument (MIRI) of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)

2005· article· en· W254658573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ralph Hofferbert, D. Lemke, A. Böhm, Fulvio De Bonis, M. Ebert, U. Grözinger, Th. Henning, A. Huber, S. Kuhlmann, J. Ramos, Ralf-Rainer Rohloff

Bibliographic record

VenueMax Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJames Webb Space TelescopePhysicsOrbital mechanicsSpitzer Space TelescopeAerospace engineeringTelescopeObservatoryOpticsOptical telescopeAstronomyRemote sensingEngineeringSatelliteGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUME In 2012 NASA will launch the JWST as successor of the Hubble Space Telescope. Four scientific instruments will investigate the near and mid infra-red range between 0.6 and 28.3 microns. The Mid Infra-Red Instrument (MIRI) allows for broad and narrow band imaging with low resolution spectroscopic and coronagraphic capabilities as well as for integral field medium resolution spectroscopy above 5 microns. For this large variety of astronomical observing modes the instrument is equipped with three wheel mechanisms for positioning various elements like filters, dichroics, gratings, prisms and coronagraphic masks in the optical beam. Prime requirements for these mechanisms are high reliability under cryo-vacuum conditions (~ 7K), long lifetime (> 5years), high vibration capabilities (~ 45G), high positioning accuracy (~ 5arcsec) and low heat dissipation (< 1mW). To reach these goals simultaneously in a short timeframe, MPIA has transferred experience and heritage from its previous involvements in ESA missions like ISO and HERSCHEL into early development models (DMs), which are presently in the assembly phase at MPIA. Their detailed design and qualification programme are in the focus of this paper. 1. JAMES WEBB SPACE TELESCOPE In 2012 the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST, formerly Next Generation Space Telescope, NGST, see [1]), a joint venture between NASA, ESA and CSA, will be launched on an ARIANE 5 carrier. After a journey of more than 100 days as far as 1.5 Mio km away from the earth in the anti-solar direction, the 6600kg observatory will enter a trajectory to reach its final orbit around the second Lagrange point L2. The successor of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) comprises a 6.5m primary mirror, see Fig. 1, passively cooled to about 45K and hosts 4 focal plane instruments: NIRCam (visible/near infra-red camera, 0.65μm, NASA contribution), FGS (near infra-red tunable filter camera, 1.24.8μm, CSA contribution) NIRSpec (near infra-red multi-object spectrograph, 0.6-5μm, ESA contribution), MIRI (mid infra-red camera and spectrograph, 5-28μm, 50% NASA / 50% ESA contribution, see [2]). While NIRCam, FGS and NIRSpec will work at a temperature of 35K passively reached by the use of radiators on the instrument’s outer walls, MIRI comprises an independent cryo cooler system for active cooling of the optical bench to about 7-18K and of the detectors down to 6K. JWST is conceived for a mission lifetime of 5 years in space, with a goal of 10 years. Fig. 1: The James Webb Space Telescope: A primary mirror of 6.5m diameter and 25m surface (pieced together by 18 monolithic beryllium hexagons) collects the light for the four scientific instruments mounted on the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM, behind the M1). This structure also carries the cold head of MIRI’s cryo cooler and the Fine Guidance Sensors (FGS, Canadian contribution) for guiding and highly stabilized pointing of the observatory. A huge (tennis court size) multi-layer radiation shield blocks the direct sunlight. The spacecraft bus and the sunlight collectors are located below this shield facing towards the earth on a collateral orbit around the sun. (Source: Northrop Grumman Space Technology, NGST). 2. MID-INFRARED-INSTRUMENT: MIRI MIRI features a modular optical design in conjunction with an iso-thermal all aluminium construction, see Fig. 2. Optically the instrument is divided into an imager channel and two spectrometer channels. All channels end up in a 1kx1k Si:As detector array. The imager channel covers the range 5 to 27μm with 0.11arcsec pixels and a 1.3x1.7arcmin field of view (FOV). Additionally coronagraphy is possible at four wavelengths in this range as well as low resolution spectroscopy (double-prism + slit) with R~100. The spectrometer channel provides medium resolution integral field spectroscopy with R~3000 between 5 and 28.3μm and a 3.5x3.5 – 7x7 arcsec FOV. Only recently, due to a mass budget problem MIRI’s solid hydrogen dewar concept has been cancelled and exchanged by a Joule-Thompson cooler system (with a Stirling or pulse tube pre-cooler). Basic changes for the MIRI Optics Module are the implementation of a cold stage at 18K (e.g. for harness thermal sinking purposes) and an important temperature shift for the detector cold end from 6.9K to 6.0K allowing for a drastic reduction in dark currents. Fig. 2: The MIRI Optical Module (OM). The three wheel mechanisms are located within MIRIM (imager) and SPO (spectrometer).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMax Planck Institute for Plasma PhysicsSame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207