MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546593509 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726857

Saturable voltage-behind-reactance model of six-phase synchronous machine in hybrid AC and DC generation system

2016· article· en· W2546593509 on OpenAlexaff
Navid Amiri, Seyyedmilad Ebrahimi, Yingwei Huang, Juri Jatskevich, H.W. Dommel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReactanceInterfacingStatorComputer scienceThree-phaseElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)SnubberElectric power systemVoltagePower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringCapacitor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Six-phase synchronous machines are utilized in special applications, such as naval and aircraft power systems, due to lower power per-phase, less mechanical stress, and higher reliability compared to three-phase machines. The voltage-behind-reactance (VBR) machine models offer advantages in transient simulation programs such as capability of interfacing with arbitrary networks without snubber circuits and reduced system matrix size, compared to conventional qd0 model and coupled circuit phase-domain model (CCPD). This paper presents a VBR model of a six-phase synchronous machine that considers stator mutual inductances and main flux saturation. Performance of the proposed saturable VBR model is investigated in a hybrid ac-dc generation system. Simulation results verify numerical advantages of the proposed model in terms of accuracy and simulation speed over the conventional CCPD and qd0 models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207