MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2546613757 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726847

Joint time invariant and time dependent brain connectivity network estimation

2016· article· en· W2546613757 on OpenAlexaff
Aiping Liu, Xun Chen, Xiaojuan Dan, Martin J. McKeown, Z. Jane Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsPacific Centre for Reproductive MedicineUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInferenceFlexibility (engineering)Dynamic functional connectivityInvariant (physics)Resting state fMRIArtificial intelligenceMachine learningNeurosciencePsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inferring interactions between discrete brain regions has being increasingly recognized as important for studying brain in both normal and disease states. In addition to static brain network inference, the temporal dynamics of brain connectivity access the brain in the temporal dimension and provide a new perspective to the understanding of brain function. Most current brain network modeling approaches are based on assumptions that brain connections are purely static or purely dynamic. This may be unrealistic as the brain must strike a balance between stability and flexibility. In this paper, we propose making joint inference of time invariant connections and time varying coupling patterns by employing a multitask learning model followed by a least square approach to precisely estimate the connectivity coefficients. When applied to a real resting state fMRI study, the eigenconnectivity networks were extracted to obtain the representative patterns of both static and dynamic brain connectivity networks. The results demonstrated that the static and dynamic connectivity networks may represent complementary information on the brain connectivity patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies→French-language works237,207→