MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546708860 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726759

Effects of false sharing and locality on object layout optimization for multi-threaded applications

2016· article· en· W2546708860 on OpenAlex
Taees Eimouri, Kenneth B. Kent, Aleksandar Micić

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsIBM (Canada)University of New Brunswick
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyNew Brunswick Innovation Foundation
KeywordsLocalityComputer scienceJavaLatency (audio)IBMLocality of referenceParallel computingOperating systemDistributed computingCache

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One approach to decrease the gap between memory latency and processor speed is improving locality of data. Data layout optimization is a way to increase locality by reordering data elements in memory. Unfortunately, for multi-threaded applications, the issue is more complex due to the effects of false sharing. In this paper, the effect of locality and false sharing on multi-threaded applications is investigated. Therefore, fields are reordered inside Java objects in such a way that improves the locality of reference among them and also decreases the estimated probability of false sharing. Considering the role of the JVM in laying out Java objects fields, IBM's JVM is modified with the ability to reorganize fields based on the profiled information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it