MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2546751355 · doi:10.1109/icm-02.2002.1161488

A fully parallel-pipelined architecture for full-search block-based motion estimation

2004· article· en· W2546751355 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammed S. Sayed, Wael Badawy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMotion estimationBlock (permutation group theory)Computer scienceVery-large-scale integrationEncoderComputer hardwareParallel computingCMOSBlock sizeAdderComputationAlgorithmEmbedded systemElectronic engineeringKey (lock)EngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The motion estimation block in the digital video encoder is the most important block and the most difficult block to design. The block-based motion estimation is simple technique for doing motion estimation and it is suitable for VLSI implementation. The full search block-based motion estimation suffers from the huge number of computations needed to look for the best match block among all the candidate blocks. To face this computation cost parallel and pipelined implementations are needed. This paper presents innovative parallel-pipelined architecture for full-search block-based motion estimation. Full search block matching algorithm is used in the proposed architecture. The proposed architecture has been prototyped, simulated and synthesized for 0.18 /spl mu/m CMOS technology using TSMC standard cells. Using 100 MHz clock frequency the proposed architecture needs 50.5 /spl mu/sec to compute the motion vectors, which enables processing of more than 10k frames per second. The prototyped architecture consumes 312.07 mW with 1.6 V supply voltage and has core area of 0.795 mm/sup 2/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207