Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are currently one hundred and eighty-three NSIS exchange partners.One institution, Exchange Centre for Scientific Literature, Helsinki, Finland cancelled their exchange program with us over the past year.The number of institutional members has decreased by one and is now at twenty-six.Department of Fisheries & Oceans Library, Atlantic Fisheries Gulf Region cancelled their membership in May 2009.Invoices were sent out in January 2010 for institutional memberships and to date we have received payment for fifteen renewals.To date no issue of the Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science has been published in the 2009/10 year, so no mailing to exchange partners and institutional members has taken place.Sales of past volumes of the Proceedings during 2009/2010 generated $693.00 in revenue.(See Appendix A (attached) for details.)There are 43 copies of the Flora of Nova Scotia by A.E. Roland on hand @ $35.00 each.The Librarian submitted the required forms to Access Copyright for the 2009 repertoire payment to publishers.A cheque in the amount of $507.26 was received.During the summer of 2009 volumes 7-12 (1886-1910) of the Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science were digitized and made available online through a digital initiative in the Dalhousie University Libraries.These volumes were deposited in DalSpace and can be viewed at http:// www.library.dal.ca/collections/digitalcollections/nsis.There are plans to continue this digitization project and volume 13 (1910)(1911)(1912)(1913)(1914) onwards will be worked on during the summer of 2010.Publications continue to be received regularly from our 183 active exchange partners and this material is added on an ongoing basis to the collection.I would like to thank Carol Richardson and the Serials Department staff in the Killam Library who ensure that the NSIS Library operations continue to function smoothly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.523 | 0.493 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".