MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25469214

Effectiveness of the heat-activated nitinol smart piston stapes prosthesis in stapedectomy surgery.

2011· article· en· W25469214 on OpenAlexaff
John J W Cho, Warren K. Yunker, Paulette Marck, Paul A Marck

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStapedectomyProsthesisMedicinePiston (optics)SurgeryStapesOtosclerosisMiddle ear
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To compare the SMart piston stapes prosthesis to a standard manual crimp prosthesis on operative time and air-bone gap (ABG) closure in stapedectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. METHODS: The charts of patients undergoing stapedectomy for otosclerosis were analyzed. We compared the results of 76 patients (80 ears) who received the autocrimping SMart piston prosthesis to those of 21 patients (21 ears) who received the conventional manual crimp Fisch-type prosthesis. Data were analyzed using t-test, chi-square, or two-way analysis of variance where appropriate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Operative time with ABG closure as a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in operative time between the Fisch-type prosthesis and the SMart piston prosthesis groups. The operation required 28.9 ± 3.2 minutes when using the Fisch-type prosthesis, whereas 21.2 ± 2.4 minutes were needed when using the SMart piston (p < .001). There was a significant improvement in postoperative ABG for both the Fisch-type piston (28.1 ± 3.1 to 9.0 ± 1.4, p < .001) and the SMart piston (25.1 ± 3.7 to 8.2 ± 2.5, p < .001) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the SMart piston prosthesis results in ABG closure similar to that of the traditional Fisch-type prosthesis but offers the added advantage of reduced operative time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207