Bibliographic record
Abstract
Friedrich Nietzsche remains one of the most influential thinkers of the nineteenth century.The large number of his works, the wide variety of themes and problems he treated, his changes of opinion, and the status of his unpublished and largely untranslated notes (Nachlass) have all contributed to divergent and opposing interpretations of his thought.Within these wide-ranging scholarly debates, Nietzsche's political ideas and his bearing on political thought are an especially divisive issue, as he does not fit easily into the genre of political thought and his oeuvre lacks recognizably political texts.Nietzsche's cult of the individual and his concern with morality has led the majority of scholars to consider him as a non-political thinker.Despite this, some of Nietzsche's key philosophical concepts have an 1 unmistakeably political character, such as the will to power and master and slave morality.For this reason, a growing body of literature has begun to challenge the anti-political reading of Nietzsche and examines the political dimension of his thought.Those scholars who agree 2 that politics does have a significant place in Nietzsche's works emphasise different parts of his project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".