MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547012887 · doi:10.1109/icr.2006.343154

Prediction of Sea Clutter Based on Chaos Theory with RBF and K-mean Clustering

2006· article· en· W2547012887 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaohong Su

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicChaos control and synchronization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsClutterCluster analysisNonlinear systemArtificial neural networkComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTime seriesPattern recognition (psychology)Applied mathematicsMathematicsMachine learningPhysicsRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial neural network (ANN) has been widely applied in time series analysis, typically, it can give an effective method to solve complicated problems which are too complex to understand in physic and statistic method, or observation data varied statistically and the data generated in nonlinear mechanism. Based on the underlying dynamic mechanism of the sea clutter, to reconstruct the nonlinear model of dynamical phase space, correlation integral (also called C-C method) and Cao method are used to get time delay tau and embedding dimension <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">m</sup> in this paper. Furthermore, an algorithm of radial basis function (RBF) with k-mean clustering to adjust and modify the networks is also presented to predict the nonlinear characteristic sea clutter for the goal of detecting the weak target signals beneath the sea clutter. With the new algorithms, computation complexity can be deduced while its reliability can be greatly improved. It also can satisfy the real-time requirement in real application. More detailed calculates and test results are presented

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.829
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos control and synchronizationFrench-language works237,207