MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547017901 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2016.7726845

Real-time heartbeat outlier removal in electrocardiogram (ECG) biometrie system

2016· article· en· W2547017901 on OpenAlexaff
Wael Louis, Majid Komeili, Dimitrios Hatzinakos

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeartbeatBiometricsOutlierComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Word error rateAnomaly detectionNoise (video)Speech recognitionMixture modelGaussian noiseComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrocardiogram signal is prone to noise interference. Processing noisy signals in an automated system such as biometric systems negatively affects its performance. In this paper, we developed a real-time abnormal electrocardiogram heartbeat detection and removal. The proposed technique eliminates outliers in real-time while subjects data are being collected. We used Gaussian mixture model to model normal electrocardiogram heartbeat. A Gaussian mixture of 2 components achieved the least equal error rate of 12% in separating normal from abnormal heartbeats. We utilized this outlier removal method in a biometric system and examined it on a fingertip acquired ECG signals database. The designed biometric system had an equal error rate of 5.94% in comparison to 12.30% in a state of the art approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207