Fractional order fuzzy sliding mode controller for the quarter car with driver model and dual actuators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ride quality and travel comfort of the passenger is based on the type of the suspension system used in the vehicle. The active suspension system is one of the good choices to reduce the vibration and enhance the travel comfort. In this study, a quarter car with integrated seat suspension and driver model (QCSD) is considered for analysis. The controllers are designed for both single actuator (SA) and dual actuator (DA). To reduce the vibration and increase the travel comfort, different types of sliding mode controllers (SMCs) such as fuzzy SMC (FSMC), fractional order SMC and fractional order FSMC (FrFSMC) are designed and simulated in the active suspension system of the QCSD. Three types of road disturbances are used to stimulate the vibration in the system. The responses of the controllers with the QCSD are compared with the passive system and existing state feedback controller. The result shows that the FrFSMC performs better than the other controllers for DA as well as SA. While comparing the DA and SA, DA performs better than SA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".