MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2547066521 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2016.7730495

Characterizing pollution weather patterns using satellite carbon monoxide data

2016· article· en· W2547066521 on OpenAlexaff
Huiling Yuan, Jane Liu, Lei Lei, Han Han

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmospheric Infrared SounderEnvironmental scienceCarbon monoxideSatelliteClimatologyMeteorologySpring (device)High pressureAtmospheric sciencesTroposphereGeographyGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Satellite remote sensing of carbon monoxide (CO) has been effective in providing global measurement of CO since the 2000s. This study aims to find a linkage between high CO episodes and weather patterns over eastern China, using the satellite CO product measured from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), along with the reanalysis meteorological data. AIRS data show high CO in eastern China, a populous and highly industrialized region. The highest CO in the region occurs in late winter and early spring, between 25 and 38 °N. CO in summer is evidently low. From the high CO days detected by AIRS, nine weather patterns are identified and their frequencies varying with season are summarized. High CO days in winter, spring and autumn mainly associate with high-pressure systems while in summer, high CO days occur mostly under low pressure and uniform pressure conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→