MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

First Indication Chemotherapy Has Role in Adjuvant Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer

2015· article· en· W2547141003 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert H. Carlson

Bibliographic record

VenueOncology Times · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDocetaxelRadiation therapyProstate cancerOncologyInternal medicinePrednisoneCancerChemotherapyStage (stratigraphy)Urology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FigureCHICAGO—Adding docetaxel-prednisone chemotherapy to standard androgen ablation and radiation therapy reduces the risk of death for men with high-risk, localized prostate cancer, according to data from the Phase III RTOG 0521 study. As reported here at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (Abstract LBA5002), the four-year overall survival rates after 5.5 years of follow-up were 89 percent in the standard-therapy group versus 93 percent in the group who received added docetaxel group. Similarly, five-year disease-free survival rates were 66 and 73 percent, respectively. “This study is the first indication that chemotherapy has a role in the adjuvant treatment of localized prostate cancer, and we also expect to see an even bigger survival advantage over time,” said the study's lead author, Howard Sandler, MD, Professor and Chair of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Therapeutics at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. “This finding could improve outcomes for thousands of men.” He said he and his colleagues hypothesized that the addition of adjuvant docetaxel (at a dose of 75 mg/m2) and prednisone (10 mg) to 24 months of androgen suppression (LHRH agonist before radiotherapy, oral antiandrogens through the end of radiotherapy) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy/intensity-modulated radiation therapy (3DCRT/IMRT) would increase overall survival. 3 Categories RTOG 0521 was designed to detect improvement in four-year overall survival in patients in any of three categories: Gleason score 7-8, any T-stage, and PSA greater than 20 ng/mL; Gleason score 8, stage T2 or higher, any PSA level; or Gleason score 9-10, any T-stage, and any PSA level. All men enrolled had PSA levels of at least 150 mg/ml. In four years the trial enrolled 563 patients who were evaluable for response, at sites in the U.S., Canada, and Australia: 281 were randomly assigned to androgen suppression-radiotherapy and 282 to androgen suppression-radiotherapy-docetaxel. Median age was 66, median PSA was 15.1 ng/mL, 53 percent of the men had Gleason scores of 9 to 10, and 27 percent had clinical T3-4 tumors. Sandler said the trial was designed with a short overall survival assessment period, and additional follow-up is warranted to determine the long-term benefit of chemotherapy added to the current standard of care of long-term androgen-suppression and radiotherapy. The study was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute and Sanofi, with additional support from AstraZeneca for patients participating in Australia. Consistent withCHAARTED and STAMPEDE “The potential role of docetaxel in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is consistent with, and supported by our data and other studies, including CHAARTED (2014) and STAMPEDE (2015),” Sandler said. Patient follow-up will continue to determine the long-term benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting, he said, and an analysis of quality-of-life data will be performed at a later time. Disagreement from Ian Tannock The Discussant for the presentation, Ian Tannock, MD, PhD, Emeritus Professor of Medical Oncology at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and the University of Toronto, Canada, though, disagreed with the implied recommendation of RTOG 0521, that docetaxel should routinely be added to standard androgen ablation-radiotherapy treatment. “Given that RTOG 0521 reported a difference in overall survival of 93 percent versus 89 percent, using one-sided statistics, is this sufficient evidence to recommend docetaxel plus androgen-deprivation therapy after radiotherapy for men with M0 disease?” he asked rhetorically during his talk. It is expected that adding one active treatment—i.e., docetaxel in this case—to others, will lead to an improvement in disease-free survival. “But disease-free survival improvement does not lead inevitably to improved overall survival. “Men who don't receive docetaxel might live longer after disease progression. And if you look at the breast cancer literature there are many examples where adjuvant trials lead to disease-free survival but you don't get an improvement in overall survival. And in my view, for men with localized M0 disease if there is no effect on overall survival, then chemo delay is toxicity delay, and is the preferred strategy. “Here is my recommendation: Men with localized M0 prostate cancer who receive local treatment with radiotherapy should not, in 2015, be routinely offered docetaxel in addition to androgen-deprivation therapy.” Still, he said that this opinion might well change with longer follow-up on all three major trials: RTOG 0521, STAMPEDE, and GETUG-12.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.697
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncology TimesSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207