MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547198597 · doi:10.1039/c6gc02346k

Algae-mediated biosynthesis of inorganic nanomaterials as a promising route in nanobiotechnology – a review

2016· review· en· W2547198597 on OpenAlexaff
Si Amar Dahoumane, Mourad Mechouet, Kushlani Wijesekera, Carlos D. M. Filipe, Clémence Sicard, Dennis A. Bazylinski, Clayton Jeffryes

Bibliographic record

VenueGreen Chemistry · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNanobiotechnologyBiosynthesisNanomaterialsNanotechnologyPhotosynthesisAlgaeChemistryNanoparticleMaterials scienceBiologyBiochemistryBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This review presents an exhaustive and in-depth description of inorganic nanoparticle biosynthesis from photosynthetic organisms, known mechanisms and bio-applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations254
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreen ChemistrySame topicNanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsFrench-language works237,207