An Existential Perspective on Death Anxiety, Retirement, and Related Research Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Les auteurs discutent des aspects de l’existentialisme se rapportant à l’existence et de l’anxiété sur la mort (AM). Le facticité de l’existence, l’être-avec-les autres, l’influence sur la motivation de l’inéluctabilité de la mort, la quête de sens, profitant de la vie au maximum en acceptant responsabilité de sa propre vie, et la capacité de faire face à l’isolement existentiel sont tous compris dans cette discussion. Une difficulté importante c’est de séparer AM de l’anxiété de l’objet. On trouve que les corrélations entre l’âge, le sexe et AM sont variables. On discute des problèmes de personnalité et de l’orientation du rôle dans la transition vers la retraite, ainsi que la notion de Erikson de la « générativité » en tant qu’expression de l’énergie et le but de la quarantaine. Considération des problèmes méthodologiques et linguistiques dans la recherche d’AM sont discutés. En conclusion, cet article suggère des méthodologies qualitatives comme un moyen interpersonnel d’exploration d’AM dans le contexte de la psychothérapie et du services de conseil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".