MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547261552 · doi:10.1109/icics.2005.1689036

A Space-Time MSK Code and its Detection

2006· article· en· W2547261552 on OpenAlexaff
M.L.B. Riediger, P. Ho

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingAlgorithmDifferential codingComputer scienceBit error rateBlock codeSequence (biology)Transmission (telecommunications)KeyingCode (set theory)MathematicsTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the desirable attributes of both Alamouti-type space-time (ST) codes and constant envelope modulations, we introduce in this paper an ST minimum-shift keying (MSK) transmission scheme and the companion receiver. Taking advantage of the block-wise differential encoding on which the MSK transmission is based, the receiver performs noncoherent sequence detection on a down-sampled subset of the received statistics. As a result of the sequence detection, the fast-fading error floor associated with symbol-by-symbol differential detection is essentially eliminated. Furthermore, using the original received sequence and performing iterative channel estimation and sequence detection, the decisions are refined and further performance gains are observed. In fast fading, results show that the proposed receiver performance is within 3 dB of the coherent detection lower bound, at a bit-error-rate of 10-3. It attains not only space diversity, but also time-diversity from the implicit coding in MSK. Further results also demonstrate that the receiver experiences only small performance degradation when the fading samples are not constant within each ST interval

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207