MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Money Men, Misdemeanors, and Motorcar Makers: The Uncompromising Vision of Henry Ford and Those He Left Behind

2016· article· en· W2547328793 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas P. Gleason

Bibliographic record

VenueMichigan Historical Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNewspaperShareholderEconomic historyStock (firearms)DividendLawArt historyHistoryEconomicsManagementPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Michigan Historical Review 42.2 (Fall 2016): 81-96©2016 Central Michigan University. ISSN 0890-1686 All Rights Reserved Money Men, Misdemeanors, and Motorcar Makers: The Uncompromising Vision of Henry Ford and Those He Left Behind By Douglas P. Gleason In August 1932 newspapers across the country picked up the story of the death of Albert Strelow, a retired building contractor from Detroit. One called him a “man who came into considerable fame because of the money he didn’t make.”1 But the story began nearly thirty years earlier when, in the spring of 1903, Strelow built a modest wood-frame assembly plant for a newly-formed motor car company within a few yards of his own house.2 Affixed to the side of this otherwise unexceptional building was a long sign that read “FORD MOTOR COMPANY” in handpainted block letters. Strelow would also invest $5,000 in the new company and received a five-percent stake in this venture that, though uncertain at the time, was soon to become one of the world’s great industrial wonders. Four years later, Strelow sold his stock to fellow Ford investor and future US Senator James Couzens for $25,000. Though that may have seemed like a handsome profit at the time, had he waited just three more years he would have realized ten times that amount in dividends alone. And had he waited until 1919, when Henry and Edsel Ford bought out the remaining minority stockholders, his $5,000 would have earned him more than $17 million–nearly $1 billion in today’s money.3 As one newspaper noted when he died, it meant Albert Strelow “would have been one of the world’s richest men.”4 Historian Robert Lacey has described the timing of Strelow’s departure from Ford as “one of the greatest miscalculations of business 1 The Joplin Globe, 19 August 1932. Albert Strelow was the author’s great grandfather. 2 Most often misidentified as an old wagon shop or ice house converted for Ford’s use, the so-called Mack Avenue plant was actually a new building constructed by Strelow expressly for Ford Motor in April 1903. This is substantiated by a Sanborn fire insurance map showing Strelow’s property in 1897 and a building permit ledger from 1903, both from the collections of the Detroit Public Library. 3 Conversion taken from MeasuringWorth.com, The University of Illinois. 4 The Joplin Globe, 19 August 1932. 82 The Michigan Historical Review history.”5 Only one explanation has been offered for his apparently rash decision and it has persisted for more than a century. It first appeared as a brief aside in a 1915 New York Sun article heralding the “phenomenal profits” of the remaining Ford Motor stockholders and was later picked up by Allen L. Benson in his 1923 book The New Henry Ford, after which it became firmly established through sheer repetition. The story goes that Strelow was eager to invest in a gold mine in “far away British Columbia.” In need of capital, he sold his Ford stock and took off for Canada where, over the next ten years, he lost everything he had in what turned out to be a barren prospect. He is said to have returned to Detroit to take a job on the Ford Motor assembly line. This would explain why Strelow sold out just as the company was beginning its meteoric rise to industry dominance, except for one thing—it is largely untrue. Though Strelow did invest in a gold mine, he launched that venture three years before he sold his Ford stock, and the mine was not in “faraway British Columbia” (nor in the Yukon, where some subsequent authors have placed it) but rather a few miles above the Minnesota state line.6 Though Strelow visited the mining site twice for inspection, in 1903 and 1905, he otherwise seemed to have rarely even left Detroit for any length of time. He journeyed to Lansing in 1909 as part of a delegation of summer cottage property holders lobbying for rights to obtain title to land in the St. Clair Flats, a cluster of small islands in Lake St. Clair...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMichigan Historical ReviewSame topicRace, History, and American SocietyFrench-language works237,207