MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2547331439 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfw356

Clinical Practice Guideline on management of older patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b or higher (eGFR &lt;45 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>)

2016· article· en· W2547331439 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ken Farrington, Adrian Covic, Naomi Clyne, Leen De Vos, Andrew R. Findlay, Denis Fouque, Tomasz Grodzicki, Osasuyi Iyasere, Kitty J. Jager, Hanneke Joosten, Juan F. Macías Núñez, Andrew Mooney, Dorothea Nitsch, Marijke Stryckers, Maarten W. Taal, James Tattersall, Dieneke van Asselt, Nele Van Den Noortgate, Ionuţ Nistor, Wim Van Biesen

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilEuropean Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant AssociationMaastricht Universitair Medisch CentrumUniversity of NottinghamUniversity of LeedsBen-Gurion University of the NegevLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineKidney Research UKEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversity of TorontoUniversiteit Maastricht
KeywordsGuidelineMedicineKidney diseaseClinical PracticeStage (stratigraphy)European unionPopulationIntensive care medicineInternal medicineDiseaseFamily medicinePathologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acute kidney injury CKD Chronic kidney disease CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration CM Conservative management eGFR Estimated glomerular filtration rate ERA-EDTA European Renal Association -European Dialysis and Transplant Association ERBP European Renal Best Practice ESKD End-stage kidney disease HD Hemodialysis HR Hazard ratio KFRE Kidney Failure Risk Equation MD Mean Difference MDRD Modification of Diet in Renal Disease OR Odds Ratio PD Peritoneal dialysis QoL Quality of life RCT Randomized controlled trial REIN Renal Epidemiology and Information Network RR Relative Risk RRT Renal replacement therapy SGA Subjective global assessment 95% CI 95% Confidence Intervalcandidate.It was decided that, next to the actual members of the guideline development group, additional external experts would be approached for their expertise in specific areas.Next to setting up a guideline development group, it was decided to perform a formal scoping procedure [1] to define the topics of interest to be covered within the guideline.For this aim, a separate expert group was assembled. Expert panel scoping procedure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations134
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207