Web services for the new internet: discussion and evaluation of the provisioning of interdomain services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In these last few years, the Internet as it is today has put some limitations on the evolution of new services. Problems such as address space scarcity, mobility, sensor networks and VoIP are becoming common requirements now and will be more frequent in future. However, the current Internet architecture does not support this evolution. In 2003, Jon Crowcroft [1] discussed the problems of the Internet Architecture. In January 2005, a report from NSF [2] addressed the barriers that need to be faced in order to overcome limitations towards a new internetworking architecture. In this paper, we discuss how Web services can be useful in solving some interdomain problems. The strong interaction between ISPs already exists and will be more necessary as new services appear. We believe that the Web services solution is a facilitator in this path. Our discussion is supported by the CANARIE [3] research point of view that everything is a service. We use this idea in the context of interdomain interactions where each domain is then seen as a service. We developed an architecture to support these interactions and evaluated the prototype in terms of time and bandwidth consumption to provide interdomain services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".